On Monday, October 2nd, 2023, the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to New York's rent-stabilization regulations, which limit rent increases and allow tenants to renew their leases indefinitely.
The landlords’ point of view: The challengers stated that the rules violate their property rights under the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court has previously ruled that government regulation of private property is permissible, even if it reduces the value of the property.
What the challengers were asking the court: In a petition, the landlords' lawyers wrote that they are outnumbered in the political process by tenants and taxpayers and that politicians can please both groups by shifting the burden of providing affordable housing onto a minority of building owners. In other words, the landlords are arguing that the government is unloading the responsibility of providing affordable housing to them.
What’s next: Despite the Supreme Court's decision, the landlords' trade associations have vowed to continue fighting the regulations. They say they will focus on targeted challenges against specific provisions of the law.
In simpler terms:
Got News?