Forge Development Unveils Latest Plan to Replace 94-Year-Old Church with 299 Apartments in SF's Tenderloin District

Forge Development Partners has proposed a new plan to demolish a 94-year-old church in San Francisco's Tenderloin district to make way for a high-rise building with more residential units.

Project Revisions

The developer has made several revisions to the project, with the latest one proposing a 20-story tower containing 299 apartments, replacing both the church and a commercial storefront. This revision follows previous iterations, including a controversial group-housing proposal and a plan for a 17-story, 261-unit building.

Legal Battles and Legislative Impact

Forge's earlier proposal for a 13-story building was rejected by the Board of Supervisors, leading to legal disputes and the introduction of new legislation on group housing. The current plan includes 38 affordable units, taking advantage of a state density bonus law, although the number of affordable units remained unchanged due to temporary adjustments in the city's affordable housing requirements.

Community Concerns and Opposition

Community groups, such as the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, have opposed the project, arguing that the area needs larger units for families instead of micro-units renting at high prices. The rejection of Forge's previous proposals by the supervisors was based on concerns that the units would serve as "tech dorms" for transient workers.

Legal Proceedings and Settlements

Legal challenges have ensued, including a lawsuit filed by the church and Forge against the supervisors, alleging violations of federal laws. A settlement was reached between the parties. Additionally, YIMBY Law, advocating for more housing, filed a lawsuit alleging the city systematically delays housing projects. However, a judge deemed the case regarding Forge's group housing project moot, as the developer had shifted focus to the current residential tower plan.

Conclusion

Forge Development Partners' proposal for 450 O'Farrell Street has faced multiple revisions, legal battles, and community opposition, reflecting the complex dynamics of housing development in San Francisco's Tenderloin district.